Prasad Modak's Blog

What’s in a Name?

It all began, in a moment of idle curiosity.

I was at Mumbai’s historic Royal Bombay Yacht Club (RBYC), standing before the grand Roll of Honour — polished teakwood boards with gold lettering, chronicling decades of regatta winners, commodores, and champions. Founded in 1846, with its elegant neo-Gothic clubhouse completed in 1896, the RBYC’s distinguished sailing pedigree – a legend.

As my eyes moved slowly down the list, I realised I was reading not just 150 years of maritime history, but the diverse personalities the names seem to express. Some names were crisp and commanding, the kind you could imagine steering a yacht unflinchingly through a monsoon squall. Other names had the melody of quivering waves, carrying a rhythm that seemed to belong as much to the sea. And then there were names so long they seemed to spill beyond the plank’s edge. I found myself wondering about the lives behind each engraving, and the stories the varnished boards could tell if only they could speak.

It struck me then — a name is never just a label. It’s an introduction, a hint, sometimes even reflection of history and pride of the family you belong to. O Shakespeare; forgive me, there’s a lot in a name.

Some names are music before they are meaning. Try saying Anoushka, Aarav, Meera, Ira, Raghav, or Devika aloud. They glide off the tongue, carrying a certain grace even if you have no idea what they mean. Others — like Vidyut, Charulata, or Samaira — have a rhythm and texture that make them feel like they are composed. This keeps the idea that certain names simply sound beautiful, regardless of their meaning.

Linguists will tell you this is about alternating consonants and vowels, soft endings, and rhythm. I say it’s also about sheer luck. I mean, some parents manage to gift their child a name that could drift like a raga played softly on a sitar at dusk. Others… well, they name their kid Gopalaswamy Venkataraman and then wonder why the child speaks so fast.

In many Hindu traditions, the first syllable of your name is dictated not by your parents’ creativity but by your Nakshatra — the position of the moon and planets at your birth. So, the priest peers into the cosmic spreadsheet and says, “This child’s name must start with ‘Dha.’” Suddenly, your life is limited to Dharini, Dhanush, or Dhanalakshmi. Of course, Hindus aren’t alone in outsourcing baby-naming to the cosmos. The Chinese consult elemental charts, Tibetans turn to lamas, Jews have their sacred gematria, and the Akan of Ghana assign names by the day you were born.

Naming conventions, of course, take many forms across communities. There’s the Parsi community — practical people who nailed the LinkedIn profile centuries before it existed. They simply made the surname with the job description: Engineer, Contractor, Doctor, Driver. Simple. Honest. No need to ask what they do — the clue is right there. Though it does occasionally lead to comic moments now, like meeting a Mr. Engineer who runs a bakery, a Ms. Driver who hasn’t been behind the wheel in decades, or a Mr. Doctor who practices law. Very few Parsis today have retained their original professions — the names remain, but the job descriptions have changed long ago.

In South India, the geography lesson comes free with the name. It’s common to prefix your given name with the village or town you come from — Kanchipuram Rajesh, Tirunelveli Subramanian. Every introduction is a cultural GPS coordinate. This tradition has the added benefit of keeping your roots intact, even if you’ve spent the last twenty years in Silicon Valley explaining to people that Kanchipuram is not your middle name.

Many used to give names that had a devotional meaning. Many Indian families for instance name children after deities — Vishnu, Lakshmi, Ganesh. It’s brilliant: every time you call them, you’re also chanting a prayer. Imagine a mother shouting from the kitchen, “Vishnu! Come eat your vegetables!” Or a father yelling “Lakshmi, finish your homework!” — instant Godly invocations!

But not everyone accepts the name they’re given at birth. Some decide early on that their original naming just doesn’t suit them. Some reasons are practical:

– Gopalaswamy Venkataraman shortens to G.V. Ram because filling online forms was becoming a test of patience.
– A Pinky grows up, becomes a high court judge, and decides that “Justice Pinky” may not inspire the right kind of respect and fear.

Other examples are names driven by aspiration:
– Musicians reinvent themselves with stage names (Reginald Dwight became Elton John).
– Actors adopt names that look good on posters (Krishna Pandit Bhanji became Ben Kingsley).

Do names shape who we become? There’s a theory — part psychology, part superstition — that names are not neutral. They’re tiny seeds of expectation planted at birth.

Name a child Vikram, and people picture someone decisive, dependable, and possibly with a moustache that inspires respect. Or call your daughter Charulata, and strangers will imagine someone who recites poetry and owns a collection of handwoven sarees.

Some traditions make this expectation explicit. Sometimes, a name isn’t a reflection of who you are but a projection of what your parents hoped you would be. In many Indian families, a child named after a deity is expected to embody those qualities — a Vishnu should be calm and protective, a Durga should be fierce yet nurturing. It’s both a blessing and a subtle form of life-long performance pressure. Can you imagine a bartender named Vishnu? He may well change his name to Wishu while mixing the drinks to the Wish of his customers!

In some parts of India, until frighteningly recently, it was common for a husband to rename his wife after marriage. This was seen as an assertion of authority — the man not only “owned” the relationship but also the very identity of the woman. According to my Professor Friend this is nothing short of a civilized form of slavery — erasing a name chosen by her parents.

But here’s the quiet truth that unsettles me most: the poor newborn, fresh into the world, has no say at all in what they will be called. The very first gift — or burden — of identity is handed down without their consent.

We like to imagine ourselves as independent beings, authors of our own life story. Yet, from the moment our very first name is inked onto a birth certificate, we begin life carrying a choice made entirely by others. It is our first label, our first inheritance — bestowed without consultation, yet carried for years, sometimes a lifetime.

In that small but profound truth lies a quiet reminder: independence is not our starting point, and it certainly wasn’t when we were named. The irony? We repeat the pattern cheerfully when naming our pets, never once asking for their opinion as if they mattered.

Put simply, we enter the world already branded — no choice, no negotiations, no fine print, and not a single signature on the paperwork.

Well, even the likes of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and Thomas Jefferson — our great freedom fighters — seem to have sailed right past this small but quietly amusing truth. Now isn’t that funny?

I wondered as I stepped out of the Royal Bombay Yacht Club.


 

Exit mobile version